Be a space ambassador

Posts: 17
Joined: 2008-04-07

I don't know if this information has been posted here yet, but if not go to this link:

https://www.nss.org/cgi-bin/register/tdregister?$Origin=SpaceAmbassadors

Be a space ambassador, teach people about space, and maybe win a ride there!

Ari Litwin



Agravatb's picture
Posts: 42
Joined: 2008-04-24
Ari Thanks a lot

Hi Ari
Thanks for the post, It is related to space and you havent take more than few lines to deliver the wonderful information..

Cheers
Agravat Bipin B



rrashani_space's picture
Posts: 22
Joined: 2008-06-26
a

hiiiiiiiiiiiii.............
am a new member in thish site. am writing my idia here.

i think, when bigbang,produce matter and antimatter and after become universe and antiuniverse. if am right i think that, universe and antiuniverse repel to each other becouse of their grevitational force.that means if after finished universe,starte anti-universe(i don't know that universe and anti-universe is touch to each other or have some space),that means universe is circule of center of bigbang and anti-universe sterte after finishing universe, that means universe have a some area so same area(more or less) have anti-universe right! so i think," what becomes after finishing anti-universe?"

Othere, according to "karl anderson" every electron possese anti-electron meanspositron, so it's possible that every proton possese anti-proton. proton and electrons are become belance neucleous to their net charge (except newtron, may be possible that newtron possese anti-newtron), but they are not become balence to neucleus in their weight.

proton stay in their neucleus and elactron rotate around that neucleus so, i think that positron and anti-proton rotate around the anti-neucleus. it is possible that neucleus and anti-neucleus rotate around any one item or stay in that item like proton stay in neucleus. But, i think neucleus and anti-neucleus are both of them stay in that item because they are stable in their net charge and weight. othere reason, according to newton's gravitation law, every particle of matter attrecte every othere particle of matter that means neucleus could not attrecte anti-necleus. both of them stable in all condition. therefore, they are stay in that item.

If its possoble, i think centre of universe and anti-universe (according to me,let bigbang is centre of universe and anti-universe) is made both of them matter and anti-matter and this center have not any atterection force. therefore our universe expaned more and more now since bigbang. that means bigbang is a center of universe and anti-universe. and it is stay in their position means it is rest not moving.

If any mistek in my thought please give me ur advice.



smj2004tz's picture
Posts: 57
Joined: 2008-05-14
Nice to hear from you.

well come to the cite rrashani,

I am pleased by your wonderful contribution and I hope you will be adding alot.

you have a good idea about the universe.

keep in touch!

--

Maduhu, Sebastian
Volunteer, Space Generation Advisory Council (SGC)
www.change.org
smj2004tz@yahoo.com
+255 784 597179
Dar es Salaam
Tanzania.



rrashani_space's picture
Posts: 22
Joined: 2008-06-26
a

Hi....smj2004tz......
thanks.... if you know more about this topik plz tell me......



rrashani_space's picture
Posts: 22
Joined: 2008-06-26
a

hi.... i right my question here.

Q-"In universe light produce by reaction of matter like in our sun, sunlight produce when heliyam's atoms converte in to hydrogen atoms right! so what produce in anti-universe, light or anti-light or any other?. if any othere produce, what is that?"

if may possible plz give reply.....

-rrashani.



belovelife's picture
Posts: 173
Joined: 2007-02-04
stuff

first i thought light was produced when hydrogen
was formed into helium
correct me if i'm wrong
second
have you looked into string/m-theory
it is a cool conceptual idea on the formation of the universe
magically it also describe the big bang event
although in different terms
but it also explains the uneven dispursion of matter in the universe
third
this is a concept i have been pondering for a while
i know its wirey but try to follow my reasoning
in a pulsar all the matter is crushed to a relatively small point in space time
so much that it fits into a very small place
this also goes with the black hole theory
now as higher elements on the periodic table are formed
(similar to the h-he in our star)
these higher elements have the potential to be space time reactive
what i mean is such a dense matter could (like magnets)
emit a special gravitational field that warps space time itself

similar finding have been made to the extent of small chunks of iron orbiting viewed pulsars, very small
but this could just be the curvature of space time being obseved
whereas the small orbiting matter may be like a mirage, and the matter is actually larger but just bent in space time
the only issue i find in this possibility is like a catch 22
the collapse of the star makes the pulsar
the pulsar bends space time
matter appears smaller (from increased amount of space present at the pulsar)
but is the matter more dense and it effects space time
or the other way around

--------------------------------------
one kind word can warm 3 winter months
japanese proverb

--

--------------------------------------
one kind word can warm 3 winter months
japanese proverb



rrashani_space's picture
Posts: 22
Joined: 2008-06-26
a

hi........
belovelife.....

thanks for reply....

-rrashani.